RESUSCITATION OR EUTHANASIA? THOUGHTS ON THE LIFE CYCLE OF OUR BUILDINGS

Abstract

The article draws parallels between the healing processes of the human body and the reconstruction procedures of buildings, highlighting the decision-making processes that lead to either the preservation or demolition of a structure. It emphasizes that the fate of a building can never be equated with the value of a human life. Similar to medical anamnesis, architectural planning begins with a thorough investigation of the history and current state, followed by intervention proposals. The article explores various approaches, such as aesthetic interventions, extensions (prosthetics), partial removals (resections), and the reuse of elements (transplantation). It also addresses the “euthanasia” of buildings when their condition no longer allows for preservation. The author underscores the importance of a holistic design perspective and ecological thinking, advocating for responsible architectural decisions.